Which Is The Best Backlink Checker Tool The Results Are In To find out which is the best backlink checker tool I decided to setup a test between Ahrefs. SEO Spyglass. Raven Tools. Open Site Explorer. Majestic SEODownloading your competitors backlink profile used to be easy when the Yahoo Site Explorer backlinks checker was up and running. It really is a shame they closed it down because competitor backlink analysis is a great way to rank sites in any niche. Download Gsa Email Spider 5.36' title='Download Gsa Email Spider 5.36' />CONTAMINACIN POR OJO DE PESCADO Pequeos crteres circulares que aparecen durante o al poco tiempo de aplicada la pelcula de pintura. CAUSA. Since then a few other players have beefed up their offering including Ahrefs, Majestic SEO, SEOMoz Open Site Explorer, Raven Tools SEO Spyglass. All of these are web based services except for SEO Spyglass which is a desktop application and part of the SEO Powersuite package. I will also be testing these against Google Search Console which allows you to download a sample of your backlinks. However this is only useful to people that own the site they are trying to download the backlinks for. If you are trying to discover how your competitors are ranking and want to replicate their link profiles you cannot use Google Search Console to achieve this. Which Is The Best Backlink Checker Tool To find out which is the best backlink checker tool I decided to see how many links each service reported for 3 different websites. The 3 sites are my own so I know the history of them very well Site 1 One of my oldest sites with 1. Download Gsa Email Spider 5.36' title='Download Gsa Email Spider 5.36' />Site 2 A couple of years old with about 3. Site 3 Just under a year old still a nurtured baby with 4. Which is the best backlink checker tool I put Ahrefs, Majestic SEO, SEOMoz, Raven Tools SEO Spyglass to the test to see which finds the most backlinks Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish magazines, catalogs, newspapers, books, and more online. Easily share your publications and get. Download the free trial version below to get started. Doubleclick the downloaded file to install the software. This will give us a balanced mix of results and test each backlink checking service from a variety of angles. Google Search Console reports the total number of links it Google has found for your site under Traffic Links To Your Site which you can see in the image to the right. I will be using this number as the benchmark for the services to compare against, including the total number of sample links Google allow us to download from that total. A Quick Look At The Tools. Before I get into the nitty gritty of testing I wanted to give you a quick tour of the tools well be looking at. Ahrefs. com. I will tell you now Ahrefs. They show some fantastic data and break it down in pretty much every way imaginable. How many links you have, from how many IPs, linking to which pages with which anchor text. They breakdown the links by types and provide all sorts of graphs and visualisation options. The only real drawback with Ahrefs. Claim Your Free 1. Day Ahrefs Trial. SEO Spyglass. Download a free trial of SEO Spyglass. This is a unique offering in the fact that it is a desktop application available on its own or as part of SEO Powersuite. It downloads your backlinks from a number of sources and they even have their own database of links similar to the services above the software accesses directly. It will also fetch live real time data on the status of links, the page rank, anchor text used and so on. All of which can be exported into highly customisable PDF reports Unlike the monthly fee based services below this software is available for a one time fee of 9. SEO Powersuite. Download the Free SEO Spyglass Trial. Raven Tools. Raven Tools also has a completely free fully functional 3. In a way Raven Tools is like SEOMoz as it provides a suite of tools for managing your online campaigns. However it isnt quite as developed as the SEOMoz offering and I find it lacking in a lot of places. The back end design is really poor and a big let down from the impressive front end. You can import your backlink profile and it will monitor upto 5. It is still worth taking out the trial to download some backlinks and have a snoop around though Get Your Raven Tools 3. Day Free Trial. 4. Open Site Explorer. SEOMoz has a completely free fully functional 3. What separates this from the pack is the huge range of tools you get for your money. Open Site Explorer is just a small part of the SEOMoz offering which also includes rank tracking, weekly crawls alerting you to onsite SEO issues, on page recommendations, social media statistics and competitive backlink analysis to see how you stack up against the competition. It also includes a whole bunch of other tools, webinars, training videos and an expert community. After the 3. 0 day trial it costs 9. Majestic SEOI really dont like how Majestic SEO present their data it really does leave a lot to be desired. However when you drill down into the data it does provide everything you need to know. It is very similar to Ahrefs in a lot of ways but in my opinion Ahrefs does a much better job all round well see what the test results say about that though Prices start from around 5. EUR to 4. 00 2. EUR per month. However there is a free account that lets you run more detailed reports for websites you own. Putting Them To The Test. The real test though is how many links does each service return for the 3 sites I mentioned earlier Site 1 4. Total Links. Google reports a total of 4. Here is the data each tool returned Backlink Checker Found Found. Search Console Sample. Ahrefs. 41,9. 85. .Net Framework 4.0 V 30319 Windows 7. Majestic SEO3. 0,4. SEOMoz. 31,9. 99. Raven Tools. 27,0. SEO Spyglass. 14,4. As you can see Ahrefs takes the top spot finding a total of 4. Google. SEO Spyglass brings up the rear finding only 1. Site 2 1. 7,3. 90 Total Links. Google reports a total of 1. Here is the data each tool returned Backlink Checker Found Found. Search Console Sample. Ahrefs. 6,5. 35. 37. Majestic SEO6,4. 14. SEOMoz. 7,3. 45. 42. Raven Tools. 7,0. SEO Spyglass. 4,6. This time SEOMoz takes lead finding 4. Raven Tools coming just behind with 4. SEO Spyglass still finds itself lagging in the bottom spot though. Site 3 4. 34 Total Links. Google reports a total of 4. Here is the data each tool returned Backlink Checker Found Found. Search Console Sample. Ahrefs. 99. 22. 8. Majestic SEO8. 51. SEOMoz. 67. 15. 4. Hand Maiden Kotor 2'>Hand Maiden Kotor 2. Raven Tools. 52. 11. SEO Spyglass. 74. The final test brings Ahrefs to the top of the pack again finding a toal of 9. At least SEO Spyglass managed to move its way up from the bottom spot this time thoughA Complete Look At The Data. First of all lets take a look at the of links found for each site and service side by side. Backlink Checker. Site 1. Site 2. Site 3. Ahrefs. 8. 4. 13. Majestic SEO6. 1. SEOMoz. 6. 4. 14. Raven Tools. 5. 4. SEO Spyglass. 2. 8. Looking at that you can see that although Ahrefs doesnt always win, it does edge ahead over the others. But what about if we look at it from a total perspective and compare the total amount of links available to find across the 3 sites with the total amount each service found Across the 3 sites there are a total of 5. Backlink Checker Total Found Total Found. Ahrefs. 48,6. 19. Majestic SEO3. 6,9. SEOMoz. 39,4. 11. Raven Tools. 34,2. SEO Spyglass. 19,0. And The Best Backlink Checker IsIf you are purely after a backlink checker then Ahrefs. I place a greater value on number of links returned because I personally take all of my competitors links and load them into Inspyder Backlink Monitor which provides the most advanced analysis of the links once you have them. However for not much more money per month you can get access to SEOMoz which although returned 9,0. Ahrefs does offer an impressive suite of tools that will support your wider SEO campaigns. I was surprised to see that SEO Spyglass didnt perform better as it does have its own links database to pull data from in an effort to make up for the loss of Yahoo Site Explorer which it heavily relied on.